MARK Suite logo
§ Case study

Two brands can look identical on AI visibility and be nowhere near each other when it actually matters

By Malin Gaertig · July 14, 2026

An AI-visibility audit across major cruise lines. Ungrounded, rival brands looked like the main threat. Grounded, every top entity was a booking aggregator — and two brands saw their Share of Model roughly halved.

Share
§ Takeaways
  • —Measure ungrounded and grounded AI visibility separately — the same brand can lead one and collapse in the other.
  • —Treat aggregators as the real competitors in grounded search, not just rival brands.
  • —Fix the distribution and data cost now, before AI answers make OTA commission your default customer-acquisition tax.

Two brands can look identical on AI visibility and be nowhere near each other when it actually matters.

I audited the major cruise lines to understand how AI models mention and cite each brand when someone asks about booking a cruise. I looked at both ungrounded (memory) and grounded (live retrieval).

The memory leaderboard looked normal: every brand showed up as expected. The real threats, though, weren't aggregators; they were rival cruise lines, the two most common names appearing in about half of all responses. Aggregators showed up too, just less often, in the 23–30% range.

But the picture flipped completely on grounded data. Two of the four saw their own Share of Model (SoM) roughly halved — one from 9.8% to 4%, another from 9% to 3.5% — while the category leader actually gained ground, from 13.7% to 16%. More telling: in grounded mode, all ten top entities were booking aggregators, some at 46% share. Not one rival cruise line made the list.

What travel brands should pay attention to: as more people lean into AI models, those models route them to aggregators, not the brand. The industry built its distribution rails — OTAs, GDS — decades before AI and aggregators now own the live infrastructure agents need to quote real-time availability.

That creates a margin problem: an OTA booking carries 10–15%+ commission you'd never pay on a direct sale. On top of that, you miss out on first-party data. No email, no loyalty sign-up, no way to win that customer back directly. So it doesn't only cost you margin once; it costs you the repeat-booking economics because the aggregator owns the relationship from there. It happens one AI answer at a time, invisible until someone measures it.

§ Briefing

If You're Not in the Top 3 an AI Model Recommends, You're Invisible to the Customer

Brands outside the top three products an AI model recommends are effectively invisible at the moment of decision. The proof takes three questions and no software.

Read →
§ Briefing

Just in: What Google Killing Assistant for Gemini Means for Brands Selling Through AI Agents

Three separate stories broke this week, in three unrelated corners of the industry, and they are all describing the same shift from different angles. Google switched on Gemini as the default AI across billions of Android devices. A major payments study found that most merchants cannot see AI agents shopping on their sites even as they happen. And a US appeals court quietly decided who is legally responsible when an agent, not a person, clicks buy. Read together, they are the clearest signal yet that agentic commerce has stopped being a 2027 planning slide and started being a this-quarter operating problem.

Read →
§ Briefing

Ungrounded vs. grounded: why a global QSR brand lost to a regional challenger in AI search

An AI-visibility audit across three QSR brands in the same category. Ungrounded, the global brand won on decades of training recall. Grounded, the regional chain dominated live search and the global brand was nearly invisible. Training recall and live discoverability are two separate competitions.

Read →
§ Briefing

Just in: What Google's Ad Tech Ruling Means for Brands Betting on Agentic Commerce

This week gave us more signal on agentic commerce than the previous month combined, and none of it came from a product launch. A US federal judge reshaped how Google's ad exchange will be allowed to operate. Brussels put ChatGPT in the same regulatory box as Google Search. And for the first time, someone published real numbers on which AI shopping agents actually cite which kinds of sources. Together, they're the clearest evidence yet that the infrastructure of agentic commerce — the pipes, the rules, the referee — is now being built as fast as the shopping experience itself.

Read →

Go deeper: Product suite · Framework guides.