How often your brand is recommended versus competitors and interceptors in your category, refreshed monthly.
Explore Share of Model →Machine Preference Index measures how often your brand surfaces.
Explore Machine Preference Index →How ready your brand is to be selected by autonomous AI agents, across both AEO and ACO.
Explore Agentic Readiness Score →How AI shopping agents actually experience your site — and a competitor's — and where it breaks.
Explore Ghost Shopper →What AI models actually believe about your brand — not just whether they recommend it.
Explore Sentiment Auditor →Continuous monitoring of the data and content feeds AI models pull from, so drift never silently breaks visibility.
Explore Feed Guardian →The number moves. That's the point.
Two audits of the same cruise line, six weeks apart. Royal Caribbean's AI visibility score moved from 63.2% to 75.5% — proof that Share of Model isn't fixed, it shifts month to month as models refresh. The same audit caught something a one-off snapshot would have missed entirely: Claude quoting a cabin at $604 against Royal Caribbean's own $339 direct price, sourced from CruiseCritic and TravelWeekly rather than the brand's own site. Both only show up if someone's watching every month.
How Grounded AI Search Cuts a Cruise Brand's Share of Model by 61%.
Comparing AI training-data recommendations against live grounded search shows brand visibility roughly halve, and exposes the 10–15% OTA commission tax created when AI defaults to aggregators.
Royal Caribbean's AI Visibility Rises 12 Points in Six Weeks.
A follow-up audit shows Royal Caribbean's AI visibility score climbing from 63.2% to 75.5%, alongside Claude quoting a cabin at $604 versus its $339 direct price — sourced from CruiseCritic and TravelWeekly, not royalcaribbean.com.